MR Appeal Rulerofthe Desert: Rules Rule

Merit Rating Appeal

An Appeal was lodged by Mr Charles Laird on behalf of the horse RULEROFTHE DESERT against the Merit Rating of 81,which was allocated subsequent to it coming second in Race 6 at Turffontein  on 15 February 2011.

An independent panel consisting of Messrs D Brugman, R Napier and V Moodley was convened to hear this Appeal on 25 February 2011 by teleconference.

The Panel noted that in deciding to use BELMONTE as the Line Horse in the race on 15 February, the Handicappers were bound by Handicapping Protocol 4.6 which reads as follows:

MR Handicap Races

4.6    In cases where the 3rd horse or below is used as the line horse and the distance between the winner and the runner-up is only equal to 1 merit point or less then that will be the rating applicable to the winner. In such case, clause 4.1 will not come into play’.

The Appeal Panel however deemed the consequent 3 point increase in RULEROFTHEDESERT merit rating was too much of an adjustment, considering that RULEROFTHEDESERT has not won a race since September 2010.  In order to overcome the problem with the Handicapping Protocols, the Panel unanimously agreed that RuleroftheDesert should be used as the Line Horse.  As a result RULEROF THEDESERT will revert to a Merit Rating of 78.

The deposit fee will be refunded.

Have Your Say - *Please Use Your Name & Surname

Comments Policy
The Sporting Post encourages readers to comment in the spirit of enlightening the topic being discussed, to add opinions or correct errors. All posts are accepted on the condition that the Sporting Post can at any time alter, correct or remove comments, either partially or entirely.

All posters are required to post under their actual name and surname – no anonymous posts or use of pseudonyms will be accepted. You can adjust your display name on your account page or to send corrections privately to the EditorThe Sporting Post will not publish comments submitted anonymously or under pseudonyms.

Please note that the views that are published are not necessarily those of the Sporting Post.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Share:

Facebook
WhatsApp
Twitter

Popular Posts